Zepto Responds After Customer Complains About Receiving Used Vicks VapoRub

0
646

Particularly in times like the rainy season when going outside is difficult, quick commerce platforms have really become a lifeline for everyone. They offer speed and convenience at our doorstep for everything from groceries to everyday necessities. However, can you imagine how disappointing it would be to receive a worn item rather than something brand-new? One Zepto customer had just that experience, and he chose to post about it on X.

Zepto gives the customer a used Vicks Vaporup, and the customer posts about their experience online:

On the social media site X, a man going by the handle @addytude80 shared a troubling Zepto experience. He clarified that, much to his surprise, the Vicks Vaporub he had ordered for a youngster turned out to be used. He also included photographic proof with his tweet to support his claim.

For any parent, especially when it comes to children’s health, such an experience can be deeply unsettling.

In his post, he tagged @zeptocares and Zepto’s co-founder @aadit_palicha, voicing his frustration. He wrote,

The customer also highlighted his disappointment with the response from the support team. He stated,

By sharing his story publicly, along with pictures, @addytude80 brought attention to the importance of strict quality checks in quick commerce. He ended his post by questioning,

Such strong words reflect the gravity of his disappointment.

Have a look at the whole tweet

In order for the support staff to investigate the issue further and offer assistance, the response additionally asked the client to send his order information and phone number via direct messaging. In order to promote faster communication, the brand additionally included a link.

Check it out,

This demonstrates how quickly Zepto recognised the problem and indicated his desire to help. However, this in no way minimises the issues surrounding quality assurance of goods delivered via rapid commerce platforms.

This kind of experience is pitiful, and a refund is insufficient; a replacement is required. Such occurrences should never occur. How do you feel about this incident? Please share using the comments section below.