Jarvo Or Jarvo 69: Who Is This Jarvo 69?


Daniel Jarvis, who goes by the moniker Jarvo 69 and is known for his cricket-related antics involving unauthorized entry onto the pitch during matches, has been prohibited from attending any of the ongoing ICC World Cup matches held in India.

Jarvo 69, a figure recognized among cricket enthusiasts, recently made an uninvited appearance on the field during the World Cup contest between India and Australia at Chennai’s Chepauk stadium. However, he was promptly escorted off the premises by security personnel. In response to this incident, the International Cricket Council (ICC) issued a statement emphasizing its commitment to the safety and security of all participants in the ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup 2023.

Jarvo 69 controversies- Fined & Banned for 3 Years

In December of 2014, they appeared before the Highbury Corner magistrate court, where they were found guilty of trespassing onto a sports field without a valid reason or permission. As a consequence, they were individually fined £155 and received a three-year prohibition from attending any football matches in England or Wales.

The organization expressed its intent to collaborate with the venue to gain insights into the situation and explore additional security measures to prevent such occurrences.

Furthermore, the individual known as Jarvo 69 has been banned from attending any further matches at the event, with the matter now under the jurisdiction of Indian authorities.

It’s worth noting that Jarvo had previously disrupted play during the India-England series in 2021, making this the fourth time the Englishman, who has gained notoriety for his disruptive behaviour at various U.K. venues, has managed to breach security during a match involving India.

Jarvo 69 Fake Robbery & Kidnapping

On July 5, 2015, Jarvo 69, along with his associates Helder Gomes, Endrit Ferizolli, Dan Vahn Lee, and Ebenezer Mensah, carried out a disruptive act at London’s National Portrait Gallery and engaged in a staged incident at the Tate Gallery. During these events, they donned masks, made loud and disruptive noises within the art galleries, and even brought along their own makeshift artworks, which they displayed while apparently attempting to steal artworks from the galleries.

Subsequently, they were apprehended on the same day for offenses related to public order and eventually pleaded guilty to violating Section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986, specifically for causing fear and incitement to violence. On May 16, 2016, the City of London Magistrate’s Court sentenced Jarvis to two concurrent prison terms of 20 weeks for his involvement in the National Portrait Gallery incident and eight weeks for his actions at the Tate Gallery.